Introduction
When the Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats face each other, the matchup carries historical significance, passionate fanbases, and contrasting football identities. Chicago is known for its emphasis on defensive toughness and developing offensive versatility, while Philadelphia consistently showcases a dynamic blend of physical rushing and aggressive passing. The Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats reveal how individual efforts on both sides influenced momentum, dictated strategy, and shaped the final outcome. Looking beyond the scoreboard, these statistics provide a deeper understanding of execution, consistency, and adaptability.
Overall Game Flow and Team Statistical Overview
From the opening drive, both teams demonstrated a willingness to attack. Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats established early rhythm with short passes and a balanced rushing approach, while Chicago mixed quarterback movement with inside runs to keep the Eagles’ defense off balance. By halftime, Philadelphia held a slight edge in total yards, but Chicago remained within striking distance. Philadelphia finished with approximately 395 total yards of offense, while Chicago recorded around 360. Time of possession was nearly even, reflecting a competitive contest defined by sustained drives rather than quick scoring bursts.
Bears Quarterback Performance and Passing Production
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats quarterback delivered a poised performance, completing roughly 64 percent of his passes for about 245 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. His accuracy on intermediate routes helped Chicago move the ball consistently, especially when utilizing play-action concepts. In addition to his passing production, he contributed significantly as a runner, gaining approximately 55 rushing yards on designed runs and scrambles. His dual-threat ability forced Philadelphia’s defense to account for both his arm and legs, opening space for receivers and running backs.
Bears Running Game and Backfield Contributions
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats rushing attack played a crucial role in maintaining offensive balance. The lead running back carried the ball 19 times for around 90 yards, showing patience and strength between the tackles. A secondary back added about 45 rushing yards and provided reliable pass protection. Combined, the Bears’ backfield produced close to 135 rushing yards, helping Chicago control tempo and sustain longer drives.
Bears Wide Receivers and Tight End Production
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats receiving corps delivered several strong performances. The top wide receiver recorded approximately 95 receiving yards and a touchdown, frequently winning on slant routes and deep crossers. Another receiver added around 70 yards, while a slot receiver contributed about 50 yards. The tight end finished with roughly 45 yards and was a dependable target in the red zone. These numbers highlight Chicago’s ability to spread the ball and avoid relying on a single playmaker.
Eagles Quarterback Performance and Passing Efficiency
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats quarterback posted impressive numbers, completing around 68 percent of his passes for approximately 275 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. His decision-making and pocket awareness allowed the Eagles to maintain consistent offensive rhythm. He also contributed on the ground, rushing for about 40 yards and a touchdown. His mobility was a key factor in extending drives and creating mismatches.
Eagles Running Game and Rushing Production
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats rushing attack was a major strength. The lead running back rushed 21 times for approximately 110 yards and a touchdown, consistently breaking tackles and gaining yards after contact. A complementary back added around 50 rushing yards. As a team, the Eagles finished with close to 170 rushing yards, underscoring their physical approach.
Eagles Wide Receivers and Tight End Contributions
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats receivers delivered balanced production. The top wide receiver finished with around 105 receiving yards and a touchdown, while another receiver added approximately 80 yards. The tight end recorded about 60 yards and was heavily involved on third downs. These numbers reflect Philadelphia’s depth and versatility in the passing game.
Offensive Line Performance and Protection
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats offensive line allowed three sacks but created solid running lanes. Philadelphia’s line allowed two sacks and dominated in run-blocking. Both units demonstrated toughness against aggressive defensive fronts. Chicago’s defense produced several notable performances. A linebacker led the team with 13 tackles and added a sack. A defensive lineman recorded two sacks and multiple quarterback pressures. The secondary contributed an interception and several pass breakups.
Eagles Defensive Standouts and Pressure
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats defense also had key contributors. A linebacker finished with 12 tackles and a tackle for loss. A defensive end recorded two sacks and a forced fumble. Despite Chicago’s yardage, the Eagles’ defense made timely stops. Chicago committed one turnover, while Philadelphia did not. This turnover margin proved significant. Philadelphia converted approximately 48 percent of third-down attempts, while Chicago finished around 43 percent.
Red-Zone Efficiency
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats scored touchdowns on three of four red-zone trips, while Chicago converted two of four. Both kickers were reliable, converting all extra points and multiple field goals. Philadelphia’s return units provided strong field position. Philadelphia’s lead running back earned this honor due to his consistent production and physical running style.
Receiver Route Efficiency and Separation
The Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats’ receiving group displayed improved route discipline and spacing, allowing their quarterback to find windows against zone coverage. The top receiver’s ability to win on intermediate routes was especially important, as it stretched Philadelphia’s linebackers and opened underneath lanes. For the Eagles, receiver separation was one of the defining advantages. Their top wideout consistently created space off the line of scrimmage, forcing Chicago’s secondary to shade coverage in his direction.
Tight End Usage and Mismatch Creation
Both teams utilized their tight ends as mismatch weapons. Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats tight end frequently lined up in the slot, where his size created favorable matchups against smaller defensive backs. His receptions often came on critical downs, showcasing his value as a chain-mover. Philadelphia’s tight end was heavily involved in the middle of the field, particularly on crossing routes and play-action concepts. His ability to find soft spots in zone coverage helped the Eagles maintain rhythm and avoid third-and-long situations.
Defensive Front Seven Performance
Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats defensive front showed flashes of dominance, particularly in pass-rushing situations. The defensive lineman who recorded two sacks consistently collapsed the pocket, forcing Philadelphia’s quarterback to adjust his launch point. Linebackers also filled gaps effectively on early downs, limiting some of Philadelphia’s inside runs. Philadelphia’s front seven, however, displayed superior consistency. Their defensive line maintained gap integrity and limited Chicago’s running backs from breaking into the second level. Linebackers flowed quickly to the ball, preventing yards after catch and minimizing explosive plays.
Secondary Coverage and Pass Defense
Chicago’s secondary showed resilience against a talented Eagles receiving corps. Cornerbacks contested throws and limited yards after the catch, preventing Philadelphia from generating too many explosive passing plays. Philadelphia’s secondary applied tighter coverage overall, particularly in the red zone. Their ability to disrupt routes near the goal line forced Chicago into shorter completions and ultimately field-goal attempts rather than touchdowns.
Conclusion
The Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats highlight a competitive game defined by balance, physicality, and efficient execution. Philadelphia’s success on the ground and mistake-free passing gave them a slight edge, while Chicago’s dual-threat quarterback and balanced offense kept the contest close. These statistics demonstrate how complementary football, discipline, and situational awareness shape outcomes in high-level NFL matchups, offering valuable insight into both teams’ trajectories moving forward.
You May Also Read: Atlanta Falcons vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats
